Chicago Sun-Times Jan. 6, 2005:
The government is going to double check your filing, so fill out the forms carefully. Of particular importance at the moment, is the fact that the government will check on whether male students have registered with Selective Service for any potential military draft.
Washington Post, Jan. 7, 2005:
“I do not think we can stay in Iraq in the fashion we’re in now,” Brzezinski said. “If it cannot be changed drastically, it should be terminated.” He said it would take 500,000 troops, $500 billion and resumption of the military draft to ensure adequate security in Iraq.
So which path do you think BushCo will follow? Will they hand the country to Sistani and walk away?–gm
The editor of freeinternetpress.com writes Jan. 7, 2005:
Editor: You know, I’ve had discussions with people in various capacities. Sometimes they cannot officially say “This is true”, but they can make helpful suggestions. Selective Service officials are not saying that the draft will be revived, but they are suggesting that the church gets their [CO alternative service] program ready.
The note accompanies a clip from Religion News Service, suggesting that peace churches have been encouraged by Selective Service to get “alternative service” programs ready. The date of the story is unclear. It appears to be fresh, but may date back to Dec. 29:
Here’s the horse’s mouth from brethren.org:
2) Church staff meet with Selective Service.
Three staff directors of the General Board met with staff of Selective Service at the agency’s office in Arlington, Va., Dec. 2. The meeting followed up on an unannounced visit to the Brethren Service Center in New Windsor, Md., on Oct. 8 by Cassandra Costley, director of the Alternative Service Division of Selective Service.
New Windsor has a long history of being a site where Brethren have organized and gathered around issues of conscience and military service, most notably hosting Civilian Public Service workers from 1944-46. Selective Service is the federal agency that registers and maintains a database of young men as they reach their eighteenth birthday in order to maintain an accounting of those available for military service in the event of a military draft.
“We went into this meeting with a clear agenda of opening a conversation with Selective Service in an effort to better understand why this visit to New Windsor occurred, and how we as a church could make clear our historic and active voice as a people of peace and nonviolence,” reported Phil Jones, director of Brethren Witness/Washington Office. Also in the meeting were Brethren Volunteer Service director Dan McFadden and Brethren Service Center executive director Roy Winter.
The meeting lasted well into three hours, Jones reported. Was the New Windsor visit an indication that Selective Service was gearing up for a military conscription program, the group asked. “The answer is no, according to Costley, and her immediate supervisor, Richard Flahavan,” Jones said. Costley, Flahavan, and the newly installed Director of Selective Service William Chatfield, who joined the meeting briefly, all indicated that their work was in regards to preparedness only. The New Windsor visit was made because Costley was in the area for other business and took the opportunity to make an outreach visit.
Flahavan went on to explain that there is no draft and that none is coming as indicated by statements from the White House and Pentagon in recent months, Jones reported. “He also pointed to the late October vote of Congress that overwhelmingly defeated a proposed draft bill” (HR 163), Jones said. “The gearing up for a draft and the sheer amount of funding and staff increases that would be necessary are reasons enough to indicate there will be no draft,” Flahavan stated, indicating that a draft would cost in excess of one half billion dollars to initiate. Most of the meeting was spent in learning more about Selective Service and how its Alternative Service program would operate if there were a draft.
“The fact that they were asking us a lot of questions shows that one of the things we have developed as a peace church is a lot of respect for our position,” commented Stan Noffsinger, general secretary of the General Board. Within a week of the meeting with Selective Service, Noffsinger and Annual Conference moderator Jim Hardenbrook reported on the meeting to the Council of Moderators and Secretaries of the Anabaptist Churches. The council also includes officers of the Mennonite Church US, the Brethren in Christ, the Conservative Mennonite Church, Mennonite Central Committee US, and the Mennonite Brethren USA.
Planning is underway for an Anabaptist churches’ Consultation on Alternative Service, to be held at the Church of the Brethren General Offices in Elgin, Ill. Details will be announced after the first of the year. McFadden will represent the Church of the Brethren on the planning committee along with Noffsinger.
“Now’s the time to talk about the issues of alternative service and its future,” Noffsinger said. “To me that’s the value” of the conversation with Selective Service, he added.
On this point, I think the peace movement can support alternative service on “religious freedom” grounds and other voluntary measures such as a tax form checkoff for a Dept. of Peace. These measures can begin to build pacifist seeds of infrastructure.–gm
Looking at Google for Retired Gen. Gary E. Luck, who is off to Iraq on a mission assessment for the Pentagon. He seems to be famous for his pro-missile campaign when he commanded Korea. My guess, he will come up with hard-hitting military assessments about what is needed from a command perspective, i.e. no more “Iraq lite”.
On “the future of the military” question, it looks like he’s got a pretty strong commitment to
intervention. The NYTimes report echoes Helmly’s leaked memo, that the Reserves are in extreme distress.
Challenge me for a prediction: a “national service” draft that will pull folks into the reserves. It will be sold politically as a quasi-public service with dual uses: developing civilian talent at home that can help with various civilian needs, yet most useful for emergency deployment abroad. So the draft scare was not just electioneering.–gm